Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    12:56 PM

Message Forum - Read Message

Category: Voting poll discussion > Topics Add to favorite topics   Post new topicPost New Topic
Author Topic: [Poll: 2009.37]: Should drivers be re-tested to determine driving capability? Post a Reply Back to Topics
JT

Moderator
Message Posted: Sep 5, 2009 9:01:00 PM

Should drivers be re-tested to determine driving capability?
Yes, periodically after a certain age
Yes, periodically regardless of age
Yes, after an accumulation of moving violations
No, the initial test should be sufficient
Other

Post your thoughts about this poll below.
REPLIES (newest first)
Profile Pic
nyuknyuk49
Champion Author Massachusetts

Posts:8,704
Points:1,790,415
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Jul 28, 2010 6:27:36 AM

yes
Profile Pic
cardjim
Champion Author Missouri

Posts:7,565
Points:1,726,525
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Jul 28, 2010 6:21:32 AM

yes
Profile Pic
SAVEITIL
Veteran Author Chicago

Posts:345
Points:195,775
Joined:May 2009
Message Posted: Jul 27, 2010 10:24:17 PM

Yes, after an accumulation of moving violations
Profile Pic
michigansooner
Rookie Author Grand Rapids

Posts:38
Points:2,340
Joined:Jul 2010
Message Posted: Jul 27, 2010 4:29:08 PM

yes after a certain age and number of moving violations
Profile Pic
fuel1971
Rookie Author San Antonio

Posts:73
Points:29,510
Joined:Jun 2010
Message Posted: Jun 22, 2010 10:42:02 PM

Yes, after an accumulation of moving violations
Profile Pic
jeffrey561
Rookie Author Baltimore

Posts:84
Points:26,005
Joined:May 2009
Message Posted: May 17, 2010 8:58:56 AM

Yes because it is a little scary the way people drives...
Profile Pic
bja0030
Champion Author New Mexico

Posts:1,069
Points:183,745
Joined:Jan 2010
Message Posted: May 12, 2010 7:39:48 AM

YES
Profile Pic
BIGBOOTYJUDY
Rookie Author St. Louis

Posts:40
Points:5,670
Joined:Apr 2010
Message Posted: May 4, 2010 2:15:19 PM

i THNIK DRIVERS SHOULD BE RETESTED EVERY YEAR. ALOT OF THINGS CAN CHANGE IN A YEAR
Profile Pic
g357
Veteran Author Mobile

Posts:441
Points:139,070
Joined:Jul 2009
Message Posted: Mar 29, 2010 7:48:19 PM

Some proven accident prone drivers via tickets/citations; yes indeed.
Profile Pic
bja0030
Champion Author New Mexico

Posts:1,069
Points:183,745
Joined:Jan 2010
Message Posted: Mar 8, 2010 7:44:28 AM

yes at least in flordia
Profile Pic
BobD2009
Champion Author Long Island

Posts:1,917
Points:264,885
Joined:Apr 2009
Message Posted: Jan 11, 2010 6:53:36 AM

Additional test will achieve noting people drive differently at a test than they usually do.
Profile Pic
nkb
Champion Author Raleigh

Posts:1,903
Points:343,700
Joined:Jul 2009
Message Posted: Dec 12, 2009 4:33:26 AM

yes
Profile Pic
itsmee
Rookie Author Calgary

Posts:4
Points:880
Joined:Dec 2009
Message Posted: Dec 11, 2009 2:33:49 PM

WHEN all drivers realize driving is a privilege and ability is based on knowledge earned with experience.Then take the time to watch,listen or learn from professionals operating a career with commercial licences.The need for re-testing will be reduced to only drivers with a bad history, medical/senior age requirements.
Profile Pic
rumbleseat
Champion Author Winnipeg

Posts:16,851
Points:2,724,125
Joined:Oct 2002
Message Posted: Nov 29, 2009 4:55:28 AM

Having to use a wheelchair has nothing to do with being able to drive safely. Thousands of handicapped people have vehicles converted for them, and have good driving records.
You can't formulate a good opinion based on observing that one person.
Re-think the mobility issue TAT36. If you get hit crossing the road and lose the use of your legs, you just may want the option of learning to drive a hand control vehicle (and passing the driver test in it of course) yourself. I know I would.
Profile Pic
TAT36
Champion Author Florida

Posts:1,805
Points:344,510
Joined:Sep 2009
Message Posted: Nov 28, 2009 2:18:21 PM

At license renewal time at least after 70.
Vision test.
Mobility test.
Saw someone the other day in a resturant who wasn't able to get around by himnself, had to have someone push his wheel chair to the car but he got behind the wheel and drove off very slowly on a street with a 50 mph speed limit.
Profile Pic
24541
All-Star Author Virginia

Posts:846
Points:1,375,350
Joined:Mar 2004
Message Posted: Nov 8, 2009 6:46:13 PM

Of course.
Profile Pic
mattressman13
Champion Author Indiana

Posts:1,533
Points:451,230
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Oct 29, 2009 2:55:20 PM

Everyone should be tested twice as must as required today...Safety is key and additional testing would help....
Profile Pic
HFAJR0034
Champion Author New Mexico

Posts:1,110
Points:273,015
Joined:Jul 2009
Message Posted: Oct 23, 2009 7:07:07 AM

i think the kids should (17 AND UNDER AND SOME OF THESE OLD FOLKS.
Profile Pic
MollyAZ
Rookie Author Phoenix

Posts:1
Points:120
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Oct 12, 2009 3:39:03 PM

My response is Yes, periodically regardless of age.
I came across this discussion and thought people made some great points! I am a patient care coordinator/office manager for Driving To Independence. We provide Driving Evaluations and Trainings for people with disabilities, medical conditions or who are unsure of their ability to safely operate a motor vehicle. People will come to us after a change in their medical status (upon request of their doctors or the MVD) and they will come in feeling that our program is not necesaary-"they have been driving for years!" but they often times walk out feeling greatful for the "refresher" as people are often unaware of how they forget things or are unaware of new laws. We also have a well developed "Senior Evaluation," that has helped many seniors, and their families, come to safe and fair conclusions about their driving. Please feel free to contact me for more questions at 480.449.3331 or
Profile Pic
rumbleseat
Champion Author Winnipeg

Posts:16,851
Points:2,724,125
Joined:Oct 2002
Message Posted: Sep 28, 2009 3:11:19 PM

I don't think so much emphasis should be put on a written exam. When we first studied, we had to learn distances for dipping lights, safe following, etc. Well, I couldn't tell you now what those figures are, because they have been put into practice many years ago. But in a road test I can sure show you what they are, and the practice is far more important than the ability to memorize figures from a booklet.
When we are learners, we need those figures until such time as we can actually start to visualize them automatically.
The fact so many on the road demonstrate ignorance of these distances reinforces the need to test them in the car, not on paper.
Profile Pic
mattressman13
Champion Author Indiana

Posts:1,533
Points:451,230
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Sep 28, 2009 12:53:33 PM

Certainly. We need to get problem drivers off the road and testing is
probably the only way...
Profile Pic
AnyPort
Rookie Author Oklahoma

Posts:98
Points:15,525
Joined:Oct 2005
Message Posted: Sep 27, 2009 2:07:43 AM

I think every renewal should be a complete re-test, for everyone. It would increase the cost of re-newing a license, fund wages for more examiners (JOBS!!), and get questionable ability drivers screened much more often.
Profile Pic
phawgare
Rookie Author Dayton

Posts:97
Points:60,920
Joined:Jul 2009
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2009 7:53:38 PM

YES ONLY IF THERE HAVE A BAD RECORD I GUESS..............
Profile Pic
kdgonzo
Rookie Author Virginia Beach

Posts:89
Points:476,110
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Sep 22, 2009 5:34:24 PM

Yes, periodically regardless of age. How many could pass the written exam right now after so many years? I don't think I could right now. We all need a refresher.
Profile Pic
jo977
Rookie Author San Jose

Posts:11
Points:3,700
Joined:Jul 2007
Message Posted: Sep 20, 2009 9:35:26 AM

Yes, periodically after a certain age and also after an accumulation of moving violations
Profile Pic
changpk
Rookie Author San Francisco

Posts:5
Points:325
Joined:Sep 2009
Message Posted: Sep 19, 2009 4:13:42 PM

yes, maybe there could be a catalogue of bad drivers, too, and after a certain amount of complaints about them they would have to retest.
Profile Pic
saturn96
All-Star Author Indiana

Posts:633
Points:147,565
Joined:Jul 2009
Message Posted: Sep 19, 2009 1:06:24 PM

no,the initial test is sufficient
Profile Pic
Dijana
Rookie Author Ontario

Posts:10
Points:7,300
Joined:Sep 2009
Message Posted: Sep 19, 2009 10:32:03 AM

Yes, after an accumulation of moving violations
Profile Pic
walter34
Rookie Author Portland

Posts:4
Points:145,245
Joined:Aug 2003
Message Posted: Sep 17, 2009 4:14:44 PM

A re-cert for driving privileges is a good idea, but with the economy you have to look how the extra testing costs will be paid for. You just might see an increase in renewal fees for your license and/or vehicle titles. Just a thought.
Profile Pic
TAT36
Champion Author Florida

Posts:1,805
Points:344,510
Joined:Sep 2009
Message Posted: Sep 17, 2009 6:01:34 AM

Drivers should have at least an eye exam on renewal after retirement or 70 whichever comes first. We all see a lot of drivers both young and old that seem to be a menace on the road but we all know (even though I am one) after a certain age none of your senses are as keen as when you were younger. Young doesn't always mean better but reaction times for the young are certianly better, however reaction times sometimes don't make up for the experience of what should and shouldn't be done. We take a test when we first drive why not periodically as age advances if not for all.
Profile Pic
KrazyDawg
Champion Author California

Posts:2,320
Points:388,685
Joined:Aug 2007
Message Posted: Sep 16, 2009 8:29:52 AM

Testing needs to be increased in densely populated areas that cause traffic like LA. Some of the traffic is caused by people that can't drive not because of more cars. On a recent road trip, I noticed cars trying to pass on the right lane when there was already a lack of space and cars were already braking ahead causing additional traffic.
Profile Pic
mattressman13
Champion Author Indiana

Posts:1,533
Points:451,230
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Sep 15, 2009 2:46:06 PM

Testing should occur for those sixty-five every other year. It would
probably be a "pain" for most but it is better to be tested than to allow people with problems to be on the road. I would like to be a safe as possible...
Profile Pic
Kowkisser
All-Star Author Albany

Posts:971
Points:203,650
Joined:May 2008
Message Posted: Sep 15, 2009 7:44:36 AM

There should be retesting, maybe every 15 years until age 65, then every 5 years or so. There should also be an eye test, not only to see if you need glasses, but whether you can drive at night. I know that a lot of states have graduated licences for teens, that restrict when they can drive.

The eye test can give you a restriction that you must be wearing your glasses. If you have that restriction and are not wearing corrective lenses, it is the same as driving without a license. There could be a test to check your night vision, since the elderly frequently lose that. They can still safely drive during daylight hours, but are unable to drive at night. With a restriction on their license, they can still drive when they need to, just not when they cannot see well enough.

My grandfather knew his limitations. One time he got caught in traffic, so it was dark and he was still on the road. He pulled into a gas station parking lot and spent the night until the sun came up the next morning.
Profile Pic
mjp179
Champion Author Massachusetts

Posts:2,500
Points:445,040
Joined:Jan 2008
Message Posted: Sep 14, 2009 7:11:19 AM

I originally answered:
Yes, periodically regardless of age
and after an accumulation of moving violations.

More frequently before 25(?) and after 65(?) makes sense too,
perhaps the frequency could be adjusted by performance on the previous test.

Testing should include parking, backing, turns, local and highway driving.


BUT, a great point has been made that most drivers would be on their best behavior during a test.

Perhaps the public should be able to vote - by reporting frequent bad drivers by license plate numbers (with a driver description to cover multi driver vehicles?).

I recognize that this could be subject to abuse, but if each vote also counted as a partial vote for the voter to be tested too, it might be effective in limiting reporting to serious violators.



[Edited by: mjp179 at 9/14/2009 10:12:56 AM EST]
Profile Pic
GreenflashMD
Rookie Author Maryland

Posts:99
Points:632,730
Joined:Aug 2007
Message Posted: Sep 13, 2009 2:20:48 PM

California used to give drivers over 65 a road test before renewing their licenses. They may still do that, I don't know. I do know that the road test was one of the best things that happened to my father -- and to drivers and pedestrians in San Diego.

Dad had been an excellent driver for many years but a certain time in his life, definitely related to aging, he became a menace. I rode with him on the freeways and saw he got confused about which exits to take, this in a segment of highway he had driven for years. He would slow down to 30 mph or less -- a serious hazard on a high speed highway -- while he figured it out.

His car had many dents from his the posts in his parking garage -- he had lost his once keen sense of depth perception.

He was outraged to have failed the test and have his license taken away, but it was the best thing that could have happened.

Here in Maryland there are stories weekly of elderly people crashing into buildings, causing accidents, etc. Many elderly people are fine drivers but the state governments have a responsibility to protect us from those drivers who are no longer capable of handling a massive lump of metal at high speeds.
Profile Pic
JunGleJimBo
Veteran Author Orange County

Posts:379
Points:162,630
Joined:Jun 2009
Message Posted: Sep 13, 2009 8:38:55 AM

Thank you, NYSE!

JimBo
Profile Pic
kill bill
Champion Author Ontario

Posts:1,342
Points:784,730
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Sep 12, 2009 8:49:56 PM

I agree that older drivers like 65+ should be tested to see if they are still fit for driving.
Profile Pic
BenGast
Sophomore Author Boise

Posts:108
Points:206,985
Joined:Oct 2005
Message Posted: Sep 12, 2009 7:49:33 PM

I believe there should be periodic testing for both knowledge of laws as well driving skills.
Profile Pic
roadkillGA
Champion Author Georgia

Posts:3,382
Points:485,950
Joined:Jun 2008
Message Posted: Sep 12, 2009 7:44:41 PM

Yes, too many people slide by and should not be on the road.
Profile Pic
must87searcher
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:4,152
Points:809,800
Joined:Apr 2008
Message Posted: Sep 12, 2009 7:09:00 PM

After having a bad history of driving, it would certainly be good to have the driver retested. It would be even better to have it done periodically to be sure the another damaging event will not longer occure.
Profile Pic
Barry
Sophomore Author Twin Cities

Posts:119
Points:2,224,155
Joined:Apr 2002
Message Posted: Sep 12, 2009 6:40:27 PM

Yes, periodically regardless of age so no age discrimination. May be every 10 years?
Profile Pic
nyse
Veteran Author Maine

Posts:302
Points:424,680
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Sep 12, 2009 6:10:08 PM

definitely. We younger and middle aged drivers are among the worse. WE don't use direction signals. We hang in the passing lane causing people to pass us on the right. We think we own the road and take delight in building up a line of traffic behind us--it's a power trip to make all those folks in back of you drive are your speed instead of the speed that they want to drive. We speed up when other drivers pull out to pass us. We tailgate a lot hoping that will cause someone to pull over and let us by, but they seldom do. People need to be retested every 6-10 years. We develop lots of bad driving habits and there is no one to tell us otherwise. We should give up our licenses, if necessary, until we can learn to drive safely and courteously.
Profile Pic
SuperMoto
Veteran Author Connecticut

Posts:275
Points:808,410
Joined:Sep 2007
Message Posted: Sep 12, 2009 5:34:53 PM

No, the initial test should be sufficient. No big brother!This poll is only one week old by the way.
Profile Pic
chui
Champion Author Dallas

Posts:1,965
Points:1,618,715
Joined:Sep 2004
Message Posted: Sep 12, 2009 4:37:28 PM

yes, after three violations in three years
Profile Pic
Bonanza
Champion Author Boston

Posts:6,235
Points:1,575,665
Joined:Jun 2004
Message Posted: Sep 12, 2009 3:55:02 PM

Yes, periodically regardless of age
Profile Pic
CPGas1815
Champion Author Michigan

Posts:1,681
Points:246,195
Joined:Apr 2008
Message Posted: Sep 12, 2009 3:45:48 PM

I wonder when the nest poll will be posted. We've discussed this topic for two weeks.
Profile Pic
gasman60
Rookie Author Nebraska

Posts:16
Points:25,935
Joined:Jun 2009
Message Posted: Sep 12, 2009 3:38:46 PM

Yes, after an accumulation of moving violations
Profile Pic
JunGleJimBo
Veteran Author Orange County

Posts:379
Points:162,630
Joined:Jun 2009
Message Posted: Sep 12, 2009 2:57:07 PM

Driver's should be tested BEFORE they get moving violations. Great time to remind them not to tlak on cell phones, slower traffic keep right.....

JimBo
Profile Pic
N9HVP
Champion Author Indiana

Posts:7,008
Points:1,549,890
Joined:Sep 2004
Message Posted: Sep 12, 2009 2:00:31 PM

Yes, after an accumulation of moving violations.
Profile Pic
4bangerON
Rookie Author Ontario

Posts:57
Points:7,040
Joined:Mar 2009
Message Posted: Sep 12, 2009 12:57:28 PM

YES!!!!!!
Post a reply Back to Topics